deathmtn

In 2D: Manipulate In-Game works by panning with the middle mouse button, and zooming with the mouse wheel. You do this directly on the game viewport, not in the editor. Set the mode in the Game tab to 2D for this to work (Input won’t work, the input will go straight to the game instead).

Assa Abloy was founded at the merger of the two companies Assa and Abloy in 1994. Assa stands for August Stenman Stenman August.[6][1] The name Abloy comes from a contraction of the Swedish Finnish bilingual name Ab Låsfabriken Lukkotehdas Oy, meaning literally Corp. Lock Factory Lock Factory Corp. (first Corp. and Låsfabriken from Swedish, last Lukkotehdas and Corp. from Finnish). In 1919[when?] the company was renamed Aktiebolag Lukko Osakeyhtiö, understood word for word as Corp. Lock Corp.

A particular AAA developer I know of once sent surveys to 1000 players asking them which game they had played the most, then compared it with the data of what they had actually played. Not a single one answered correctly.

Zero out of one thousand players could remember their own habits enough to tell which game they’d played the most. Player answers were so consistently wildly wrong that the team involved thought that their data must have been corrupted. Upon validating that it was in fact accurate, they went back to the players and told them what their actual most played games were, and every single one said something along the lines of “OH! Right. Well, that makes sense”.

When people tell you things they’re really telling you the stories they tell themselves about themselves, and those stories may not have anything at all to do with reality.

It is not entirely clear why increasing fatigue should be associated with decreasing connectivity between specific frontal areas while also being assocaited with increasing connectivity between frontal and more posterior regions. However, the hub regions identified here are part of several networks that are critical for the control of behavior: the salience network (SN, which includes the anterior insula)*, the reward network (RN, which includes the striatum and vmPFC) 47,48 and the cognitive control network (CCN, which includes the DLPFC and anterior insula)*. One possibilty is that as subjects repeatedly perform the tasks across successive runs, cognitive resources decrease. This leads to a change in the balance between the amount of reward subjects are receiving (which is simply the intrinsic reward of doing well) and the effort required, and this change is detected by the RN.

Here again Cory is misrepresenting the LLM-critic’s argument: Sam Altman is a scam artist and habitual liar, but that’s not one of the first 10 to 20 reasons people criticise OpenAI’s products.Sure, basically every leading figure in the “AI” space seems to be unpleasant at best but that’s true for most of tech TBH. People criticise LLMs for their structural properties, their material impacts, for the way they make it harder to learn and grow, for the way they make products worse while creating massive negative externalities in the form of emissions, water use and e-waste. For the way these systems can only be build by taking every piece of data – regardless of whether the authors consent or even explicitly refuse and how the training needs ungodly amounts of harmful, exploitative labor done mostly by people in countries from the global majority. How it materially harms the commons.
…

Artifacts and technologies have certain logics built into their structure that do require certain arrangements around them or that bring forward certain arrangements. The second aspect is often illustrated by how ships are organized: Because ships are sometimes in dangerous situations and sometimes critical decisions need to be made, the existence of ships implies the existence of a hierarchy of power relationships with a captain having the final say. Because democracy would be too slow at times. These politics are built into the artifact.
Understanding this you cannot take any technology and “make it good”. Is a torturing device “good” if the plans on how to build it are creative commons? Do we need to answer the existence of the digital torment nexus by building an open source torment nexus? I’d argue we need to destroy it – regardless of what license it is released under.

The choice was simple. It was hardly a choice at all, really. I loved programming. I wasn’t any good at it, nor was I aware of what may await me after graduation, but in the months since that Intro to Computer Science course I had created a few programs that convinced me this is the thing for me. I want to make things with code.

Should we think that a school teacher who needs a cat holding up a whiteboard for a handout has a negative opinion of and respect for Art or artists? Is an 8-year old who is making pictures of Mario for birthday invitations spitting in the face of illustrators everywhere?

It's possible to respect artists greatly, even donating to them and whatnot, and still want to adorn your blogpost with a picture of a cartoon cat wearing a C64 as a hat while eating a stick of RAM.

"There is consensus to immediately deprecate archive.today, and, as soon as practicable, add it to the spam blacklist (or create an edit filter that blocks adding new links), and remove all links to it," stated an update today on Wikipedia's Archive.today discussion. "There is a strong consensus that Wikipedia should not direct its readers towards a website that hijacks users' computers to run a DDoS attack (see WP:ELNO#3). Additionally, evidence has been presented that archive.today's operators have altered the content of archived pages, rendering it unreliable."

Wesley R. Dingus, 48, is scheduled to be arraigned Thursday at 10 a.m. in Mansfield Municipal Court. The alleged offenses involve sniffing the previously worn underwear of a minor relative in his care. Both instances were recorded by a small video camera, according to a Richland County Sheriff’s Office report.

Impossible not to think here of the rise of labor unions in the tech industry and the subsequent rapid (and surely coincidental) deployment of so-called AI which—unlike nearly every prior technological development in software—arrived with mandates for its use and threats of punishment for the noncompliant. Elsewhere, Gorz talks of the trend of workers being reduced to “supervisors” of automated systems that are doing the work for them. But simply watching work happen, without any of the creative, autonomous activity that would occur if they were doing the work themselves, gives rise to a degree of boredom and stupefaction that can be physically painful and spiritually debilitating.